GO-TECH Banner Skip Navigation Links
~ Home
~ Production DataExpand ~  Production Data
~ Well DataExpand ~  Well Data
~ NM Pricesheet
~ Water DataExpand ~  Water Data
~ ProjectsExpand ~  Projects
~ SoftwareExpand ~  Software
~ ArchiveExpand ~  Archive
~ Other LinksExpand ~  Other Links
~ HelpExpand ~  Help
North American Oil and Gas News
 Terrace Energy provides update on continued restructuring plans
 Who Will Benefit From The Electrification Of Transport?
 Fed Raising Interest Rates in June? Marc Faber Says No, Is Bullish on Gold and Oil Stocks
 TGS announces new multi-client 3D program in Newfoundland-Labrador
Source: Oil Voice

NYMEX LS Crude 47.75
Navajo WTXI 0
Henry Hub 1.976
Updated : 5/24/2016
State Land Office Data Access

OCD well/log image files
PRRC     NM-TECH     NM-BGMR    
Skip Navigation Links
Skip Navigation Links.

Scale in the Oil Field

Introduction to Scale in the Oil Field

In the oil production industry, the most common scales are calcium carbonate (calcite), calcium sulfate, usually in the form of gypsum, and barium and/or strontium sulfates (barite and celesite, respectively.) Both barite and celesite have very low solubilities; thus, when either barium or strontium is present together with sulfate in water, scale formation is very likely. At atmospheric pressure, barite is about 20 times less soluble than calcite, which is in turn almost 500 times less soluble in water than gypsum (Patton, 1986). However, barium and strontium are not usually major species in natural waters, so calcium carbonate and calcium sulfate scales are much more common.

There are many methods of predicting scale in the oil field industry. Simple prediction methods include the Stiff and Davis method to predict the formation of Calcium carbonate scale, and the Skillman McDonald Stiff Method to predict the formation of gypsum and barite. (Celesite formation can also be predicted using this method but is not included in our scale prediction tools.) The Oddo and Tomson method is a more complex but accurate method of predicting formation of all the common oil field scales.



Solubility calculations are used to predict the formation of various types of scales. All minerals are soluble in water to a limited extent. Many minerals are salts and will dissociate into ions, for example,

NaCl ? Na+ + Cl- .

Multiplying the concentrations of the ions together (Cl- x Na+) will give the ion product (IP). If the solution is saturated with respect to that mineral and in equilibrium, the ion product will equal the solubility product constant, Ksp .

The solubility product constant for any salt will vary with pressure, temperature, ionic strength, and possibly pH. All salts increase in solubility as the pressure is increased, because when a salt is dissolved in water, there is a decrease in volume. As the ionic strength is increased, solubility increases up to a point when the water simply cannot hold any more salt, and then decreases. The effect of temperature on solubility differs with different salts.

The Saturation Index (SI) is the logarithmic ratio of the ion product and the solubility product, SI = log (IP / Ksp).  In other words, the SI is the log of the actual amount of mineral forming ions over the solubility of that mineral.  Thus, a saturated solution (in equilibrium) will have a SI of 0, an undersaturated solution will have a negative SI, and a supersaturated solution will have a positive SI. In addition, the saturation index has a logarithmic scale.  For example, a solution with a SI of 3 is ten times more oversaturated than a solution with a SI of 2.

It is important to remember that a positive SI does not necessarily mean that scale will form, since the kinetics of scale formation may be too slow; rather, it is an indicator that formation is possible.


Methods of Predicting Scale

Stiff Davis Method - Calcium Carbonate

The Stiff-Davis method is one of the easiest ways to calculate calcium carbonate scaling tendencies; the use of this method results in a calcite Saturation Index, and is valid between temperatures from 0 - 100ºC (32 - 212ºF) and ionic strengths from 0 - 4. Inputs needed are pH, alkalinity, calcium concentration, and ionic strength.  Stiff and Davis created this method in 1952 to be able to predict calcium carbonate scaling tendencies in brines (Stiff and Davis, 1952). Experimental data was collected for different ionic strengths at 0, 30, and 50ºC to find the K constant. These curves were extrapolated to get curves for 0 to 100ºC in steps of 10 degrees (Stiff and Davis, 1952). The Stiff page calculates the SI for calcium carbonate for temperatures ranging from 0 to 100ºC, using a polynomial fit for each K constant curve. Figure 1 and Tables 1 and 2 show the K constant for CaCO3 .

The Stiff Davis method is very simple, but it may not be accurate if the pH is not measured immediately at the sample site. In addition, it does not take into account the total pressure or amount of dissolved or undissolved carbon dioxide gas.

Skillman McDonald Stiff Method - Gypsum and Barite

The Skillman McDonald Stiff method is a way of predicting the solubility of gypsum scale (NOT the Saturation Index OR the total possible scale formed), and is valid between temperatures of 10 - 80ºC (50 - 176ºF) and ionic strengths from 0 - 6. Inputs needed are ionic strength, and sulfate and calcium ion concentrations.  It does not take pressure into account, or any barium or strontium concentrations, which would most likely precipitate out barite (BaSO4) or celesite (SrSO4), reducing the available sulfate ion concentration. The solubility constant, Ksp, is calculated using the graph of Ksp versus temperature and ionic strength (Appendix 15, Patton, 1986).  The Skillman McDonald Stiff method can also be used to predict the solubility of barite and celesite scale, if the Ksp variation with temperature and ionic strength are known.  The solubility of sulfate scales, including gypsum (CaSO4 x 2 H2O), barite (BaSO4), and celesite (SrSO4) can be predicted using Equation 1 .

The actual concentration (A) of CaSO4 in solution is equal to the lesser cation (Ca2+) or anion (SO42-) concentration in meq/L.  In order to determine if scale formation is likely, the actual concentration is compared with the solubility (S), with three possible scenarios: 
  • (1) If S = A, the water is saturated with CaSO4;
  • (2) if S > A, the water is undersaturated, and scale formation is unlikely; and
  • (3) if S < A, the water is supersaturated, and scale formation is likely.

The Skillman, McDonald, and Stiff method gives Ksp values for gypsum, and is the most commonly used method of predicting the solubility of gypsum in oilfield brines.  Tables 3 and 4 and Figures 2, 3, and 4 show the Ksp for CaSO4 , and Tables 5 and 6 and Figure 5 show Ksp for BaSO4 .


Stiff Page

The Stiff page uses both the Stiff Davis method for SI calculation for calcite, and the Skillman McDonald Stiff method for solubility of gypsum and barite. It also calculates the total possible scale amount for gypsum and barite using Equation 2 (total calcite scale is calculated using a modified version of this equation).

The Stiff page will give you graphs or tables of calcite SI, and gypsum and barite scale solubility, or total possible scale vs. temperature. Each graph has different temperature points because the original solubility data was collected at different temperatures. When using this page, you must choose whether you want graphs of the solubility or total possible scale. Regardless, the first graph will be the calcite SI vs temperature. Stiff page options:
  • 1. Solubility and Actual concentrations ?Choosing this option will give three graphs, the first of Saturation Index for Calcite, and the second and third of Gypsum and Barite solubilities, along with actual concentrations in meq/L if the two values are close.

    For example, for gypsum scale in any water sample, if the graph shows that the actual concentration of possible gypsum is below the solubility of gypsum, then no scale will occur. If it is above, then scale may occur.

    The actual concentration of gypsum is the lesser of the amounts of Ca2+ or SO42- in meq/L, which is equivalent to the total possible gypsum in meq/L if all the water was evaporated from the sample.
  • 2. S Index ?The three graphs show the SI index for calcite, and S indexes for gypsum and barite at various temperatures.

    The S index is related to the first option (Solubility and Actual concentrations) because the S index is defined as the Actual concentration (meq/L) ?Solubility (meq/L). Thus if the S index is negative, then scale will not form; if positive, then scale is possible.
  • 3. Total possible scale in mg/L ?Choosing this will give four graphs, the first of Saturation Index for calcite using the Stiff Davis method, and the rest are graphs of total possible scale in mg/L for calcite, gypsum, and barite, using Equation 2 .
  • 4. Total possible scale in PTB (A index) ?The A index is defined as the total possible scale in pounds per thousand barrels (PTB). This is simply a conversion of choice 3.

    Choosing this will give four graphs, the first of Saturation Index for calcite using the Stiff Davis method, and the rest, graphs of total possible scale in PTB for calcite, gypsum, and barite, using Equation 2 .


Oddo Tomson Method

The Oddo-Tomson method is another way of predicting the formation of calcium carbonate and various sulfate scales by calculating SI values. It is valid between temperatures of 0 - 200ºC (32 - 392ºF), ionic strengths of 0 - 4.0, and pressures of 1 - 1380 bar (0 - 20000 psig) (Patton, 1986).

Saturation indices are calculated for the different types of calcium sulfate minerals, including gypsum (CaSO4 ?2 H2O), hemihydrate (CaSO4 ?1/2 H2O), and anhydrite (CaSO4 ). Gypsum is the most common scale former and occurs at relatively low temperatures. Above about 100 ºC (212ºF), anhydrite is the stable phase; however, hemihydrate can form in temperatures ranging from 90 to 120 ºC (Oddo and Tomson, 1991). The Oddo-Tomson method can also predict the formation of barium and strontium sulfate scales.

Inputs needed are chemical analysis (including calcium, barium, strontium, bicarbonate, carbonate, and sulfate ions), temperature in ºF, pressure in psia (psig + 14.7), and mole percentage of carbon dioxide in the gas phase or, if there is no gas phase, the amount of dissolved carbon dioxide in the water. If the amount of carbon dioxide is unknown but there is an accurate pH measurement, the method uses the pH to calculate the saturation indices.

The Oddo Tomson method is more accurate than the Stiff Davis method because it takes pressure as well as temperature and ionic strength into account. In addition, the method does not require a pH measurement, but calculates the pH based on the amount of carbon dioxide gas and bicarbonate in the water. This allows a greater accuracy in calculating the actual Saturation Index of a water sample, since pH measurements decline in accuracy very quickly after the sample is taken out of its natural environment.


Oddo Page

The Oddo page uses the Oddo-Tomson method to predict Saturation Indices for calcite, gypsum, barite and celesite, taking temperature, pressure, and ionic strength into account.

This page can also calculate pH values, if one inputs the mole fraction of CO2 in the gas phase or, if no gas phase is present, the concentration of dissolved CO2 in mol/L in the water sample. If the pH value is known to be accurate, the measured pH can be used; however, using a measured pH is discouraged because the method was developed partially as a way to calculate Saturation Indices (and pH) without a measured pH value. This is because changes in temperature and pressure as the water sample is taken from a formation often leads to degassing, which in turn leads to inaccurate pH measurements, even if measured as soon as a water sample is taken.

The equilibrium concentration of CO2 depends on temperature, pressure, and salinity. Gas concentration decreases with increasing temperature and salinity, and increases with increasing pressure. Atmospheric mole fraction of CO2 is approximately 0.00035, and pure water in contact with the atmosphere will have about 0.52 mol/L dissolved CO2 using a Henry’s Law constant of 0.034 M/atm.


Mixing Page

Mixing waters will often result in some scale formation, whether mixing different waters in a holding tank or injecting incompatible water into a formation. The mixing page will allow you to mix waters with a known chemical analysis. You may specify the ratio that the waters are mixed at, and the program will assume complete mixing, resulting in the maximum amount of possible scale. (A mixing ratio of 1:1 will give the maximum possible scale when the two waters have similar ionic strengths.) The result will be the chemical composition of the mixed water, before any precipitation occurs. This can then be plugged into the Oddo Page or Stiff page to give you an idea of what scales will form, and in what amounts.
Petroleum Recovery Research Center, Socorro, NM-87801